Skip to page content
VTE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative ink ripple expressing the outward consequence of a Supreme Court decision
Supreme Court · SCOTUS

Ellingburg v. United States

No. 24-482Supreme Court of the United States

Record returned to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
Decision on file

What the Court said

The wording below comes from the Court's published disposition or opinion—not a Vote Files summary.

Official disposition

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED.

Read the published opinion ↗
Decision date
Jan 20, 2026
Opinion author
BK
October Term
2025
Docket
No. 24-482
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

Record returned to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
First seen
Aug 10, 2026
Last entry
Aug 5, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Decision and docket history

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

Record returned to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Docket entry

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Gorsuch, J., joined.

Docket entry

Restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 is criminal punishment for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause. [607 U.S. 163]

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Argued. For petitioner: Amy M. Saharia, Washington, D. C. For respondent in support of vacatur: Ashley Robertson, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of judgment below: John F. Bash, Austin, Tex.

Docket entry

Sealed material received electronically from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The remainder of the record is electronic and is available on PACER.

Docket entry

Motion for divided argument filed by respondent GRANTED.

Docket entry

CIRCULATED

Docket entry

Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and available with the Clerk (one box).

Docket entry

Brief of Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of the judgment below filed.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Docket entry

SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 14, 2025.

Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. filed.

Open court document ↗