The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
West Virginia v. B. P. J.
Judgment Issued.
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.What the Court said
The wording below comes from the Court's published disposition or opinion—not a Vote Files summary.
Official dispositionJudgment REVERSED and case REMANDED.
Read the published opinion ↗
- Decision date
- Jun 30, 2026
- Opinion author
- BK
- October Term
- 2025
- Docket
- No. 24-43
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
Judgment Issued.
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- First seen
- Aug 10, 2026
- Last entry
- Aug 3, 2026
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Decision and docket history
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., and Gorsuch, J., filed concurring opinions. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Kagan and Jackson, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. (Opinion also for No. 24-38). VIDED.
Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex; West Virginia and Idaho did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by maintaining female sports teams for biological females. [609/2]
Open court document ↗Supplemental Brief of West Virginia, et al. not accepted for filing. (May 28, 2026--Revised document and filing type to be submitted.)
Argued. For petitioners: Michael R. Williams, Solicitor General, Charleston, W. Va.; and Hashim M. Mooppan, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Joshua A. Block, New York, N. Y.
Sealed material received electronically from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. The remainder of the record is electronic and is available on PACER.
CIRCULATED
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
Brief amici curiae of Practicing Pediatric Endocrinologists, et al. filed. VIDED.
Open court document ↗Brief amici curiae of Advocates for Girls' and Women's Rights filed. VIDED.
Open court document ↗Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. VIDED.
Open court document ↗Brief amici curiae of GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders, et al. filed. VIDED.
Open court document ↗