Skip to page content
VTE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative ink ripple expressing the outward consequence of a Supreme Court decision
Supreme Court · SCOTUS

West Virginia v. B. P. J.

No. 24-43Supreme Court of the United States

Judgment Issued.

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
Decision on file

What the Court said

The wording below comes from the Court's published disposition or opinion—not a Vote Files summary.

Official disposition

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED.

Read the published opinion ↗
Decision date
Jun 30, 2026
Opinion author
BK
October Term
2025
Docket
No. 24-43
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

Judgment Issued.

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
First seen
Aug 10, 2026
Last entry
Aug 3, 2026
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Decision and docket history

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., and Gorsuch, J., filed concurring opinions. Sotomayor, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which Kagan and Jackson, JJ., joined. Jackson, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. (Opinion also for No. 24-38). VIDED.

Docket entry

Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex; West Virginia and Idaho did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by maintaining female sports teams for biological females. [609/2]

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Supplemental Brief of West Virginia, et al. not accepted for filing. (May 28, 2026--Revised document and filing type to be submitted.)

Docket entry

Argued. For petitioners: Michael R. Williams, Solicitor General, Charleston, W. Va.; and Hashim M. Mooppan, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondent: Joshua A. Block, New York, N. Y.

Docket entry

Sealed material received electronically from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. The remainder of the record is electronic and is available on PACER.

Docket entry

CIRCULATED

Docket entry

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.

Docket entry

Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.

Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Practicing Pediatric Endocrinologists, et al. filed. VIDED.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of Advocates for Girls' and Women's Rights filed. VIDED.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed. VIDED.

Open court document ↗
Docket entry

Brief amici curiae of GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders, et al. filed. VIDED.

Open court document ↗