Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Swango v. Virginia State Bar

No. 241016Supreme Court of Virginia

241016 Swango v. Virginia State Bar 07/31/2025 A Virginia-licensed attorney charged two clients what he characterized as a non-refundable $300 consultation fee. The first individual attempted to cancel his con…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

241016 Swango v. Virginia State Bar 07/31/2025 A Virginia-licensed attorney charged two clients what he characterized as a non-re…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Jul 31, 2025
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

241016 Swango v. Virginia State Bar 07/31/2025 A Virginia-licensed attorney charged two clients what he characterized as a non-refundable $300 consultation fee. The first individual attempted to cancel his consultation the day of the scheduled meeting because he no longer needed the attorney's services. The second individual simply missed his meeting. Despite the fact that the consultations never occurred, the attorney, who had deposited the fees into his operating account when they were received, refused to refund the fees. The Virginia State Bar asserted that this handling of the funds received violated Rule of Professional Conduct 1.5(a) regarding fees and RPC 1.15(a)(1) regarding the sa…

Open court document ↗