The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Al-Saray v. Furr
No. 230488Supreme Court of Virginia
230488 Al-Saray v. Furr 01/16/2025 Considering an appeal brought by the plaintiff, a passenger who suffered significant injuries, including a traumatic brain injury, as a result of a two-vehicle collision occu…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
230488 Al-Saray v. Furr 01/16/2025 Considering an appeal brought by the plaintiff, a passenger who suffered significant injuries,…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 16, 2025
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
230488 Al-Saray v. Furr 01/16/2025 Considering an appeal brought by the plaintiff, a passenger who suffered significant injuries, including a traumatic brain injury, as a result of a two-vehicle collision occurring at an intersection and to whom the jury awarded a multi-million dollar verdict at trial, but which a majority of the Court of Appeals concluded was not supported by sufficient evidence as to causation, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. From the evidence presented at trial, a jury could reasonably infer that the defendant's failure to keep a proper lookout and her failure to yield, or either of those failures standing alone, was a proximate cause of the accident. A…
Open court document ↗Documents and links