Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Carter v. Wake Forest

No. 230260Supreme Court of Virginia

230260 Carter v. Wake Forest 05/09/2024 In an appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeals of Virginia that the Circuit Court for the City of Martinsville lacks personal jurisdiction over Wake Forest Unive…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

230260 Carter v. Wake Forest 05/09/2024 In an appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeals of Virginia that the Circuit Court…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
May 9, 2024
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

230260 Carter v. Wake Forest 05/09/2024 In an appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeals of Virginia that the Circuit Court for the City of Martinsville lacks personal jurisdiction over Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and Wake Forest University Health Sciences (collectively, "Wake Forest"), it is concluded that the defendants did not purposefully avail themselves of the privilege of conducting activities in Virginia. It is undisputed that Wake Forest's contacts with Virginia were in response to telephonic or electronic communications initiated by plaintiff while she was in Virginia. Decedent did not rely on solicitations or advertisements by Wake Forest in deciding to se…

Open court document ↗