The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Board of Supervisors v. Route 29, LLC
No. 201523Supreme Court of Virginia
201523 Board of Supervisors v. Route 29, LLC 06/02/2022 In an action by the owner of rezoned property, the circuit court did not err in overruling the defendant County's demurrer because the complaint alleged …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
201523 Board of Supervisors v. Route 29, LLC 06/02/2022 In an action by the owner of rezoned property, the circuit court did not …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 2, 2022
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
201523 Board of Supervisors v. Route 29, LLC 06/02/2022 In an action by the owner of rezoned property, the circuit court did not err in overruling the defendant County's demurrer because the complaint alleged sufficient facts to state a claim that a transit proffer operated, in this instance, as an unconstitutional condition which is not enforceable. The County's argument that voluntary conditional proffers need not bear an essential nexus, nor be roughly proportional, to the impacts of the development in question is without merit. The circuit court also did not err in denying the County's motion to strike the evidence because evidence presented at trial was sufficient to prove that the tra…
Open court document ↗Documents and links