The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Kinsey v. VEPCO
No. 200703Supreme Court of Virginia
200703 Kinsey v. VEPCO 07/15/2021 In actions by two plaintiffs alleging injuries caused by radio frequency ("RF") emissions from an electric utility's "smart meter" attached to their house, the complaints do n…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
200703 Kinsey v. VEPCO 07/15/2021 In actions by two plaintiffs alleging injuries caused by radio frequency ("RF") emissions from …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jul 15, 2021
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
200703 Kinsey v. VEPCO 07/15/2021 In actions by two plaintiffs alleging injuries caused by radio frequency ("RF") emissions from an electric utility's "smart meter" attached to their house, the complaints do not specify any particular error in the installation, operation, or maintenance of the meters, but instead are directed at the RF emissions of the smart meters which allegedly caused their illnesses. Although a savings clause in federal law preserves state law tort claims, conflict preemption bars the plaintiffs' claims because the complaints target RF emissions, which are governed by the FCC. The plaintiffs' attempt to recast their complaints as negligence and fraud actions flowing fro…
Open court document ↗Documents and links