The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Logan v. Commonwealth
No. 201006Supreme Court of Virginia
201006 Logan v. Commonwealth 05/27/2021 In a prosecution for attempting to purchase firearms while subject to a protective order, a return of service on a preliminary protective order extension was not testimo…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
201006 Logan v. Commonwealth 05/27/2021 In a prosecution for attempting to purchase firearms while subject to a protective order,…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- May 27, 2021
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
201006 Logan v. Commonwealth 05/27/2021 In a prosecution for attempting to purchase firearms while subject to a protective order, a return of service on a preliminary protective order extension was not testimonial evidence and therefore not subject to exclusion under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. In light of all the circumstances, viewed objectively, the primary purpose of the return of service -- which includes the serving deputy's signature and the time and date of service -- was administrative, performing a record-keeping function and documenting that the ministerial duty of service of process was executed. The relevant circumstances indicate that the return of service…
Open court document ↗Documents and links