The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Palmyra Associates, LLC v. Commissioner of Highways
No. 191680Supreme Court of Virginia
191680 Palmyra Associates, LLC v. Commissioner of Highways 12/17/2020 In a condemnation proceeding, the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in striking the testimony of a co-owner of the property, desig…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
191680 Palmyra Associates, LLC v. Commissioner of Highways 12/17/2020 In a condemnation proceeding, the circuit court did not abu…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Dec 17, 2020
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
191680 Palmyra Associates, LLC v. Commissioner of Highways 12/17/2020 In a condemnation proceeding, the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in striking the testimony of a co-owner of the property, designated as an expert, which was based on a per-lot valuation of the residue of the property after the taking, in a case where the property had not been subdivided into lots. Nor was there an abuse of discretion in the court's refusal to admit ten-year-old site plans into evidence. The landowner's agreement after trial to confirmation of the valuation of the take bars a third assignment of error under the invited-error doctrine. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links