Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. v. F.H. Furr Plumbing

No. 171192Supreme Court of Virginia

171192 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. v. F.H. Furr Plumbing 08/01/2019 In a case involving allegations of fraud, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and other claims, the circuit court erred in denying a defense…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

171192 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. v. F.H. Furr Plumbing 08/01/2019 In a case involving allegations of fraud, breach of contract, …

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Aug 1, 2019
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

171192 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. v. F.H. Furr Plumbing 08/01/2019 In a case involving allegations of fraud, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and other claims, the circuit court erred in denying a defense motion to set aside the jury's $3 million verdict. In the circumstances of this case, it was reversible error to rule that the defendant waived its statute of limitations argument when it did not refile its special plea on limitation grounds after the plaintiff filed (at the direction of the circuit court) a second amended complaint repeating certain averments verbatim. It was also error to conclude that the defendant waived the statute of limitations defense to those claims by failin…

Open court document ↗