The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Spinner v. Commonwealth
No. 180583Supreme Court of Virginia
180583 Spinner v. Commonwealth 05/30/2019 In a murder case, the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of police interrogations after he received Mi…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
180583 Spinner v. Commonwealth 05/30/2019 In a murder case, the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to supp…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- May 30, 2019
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
180583 Spinner v. Commonwealth 05/30/2019 In a murder case, the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of police interrogations after he received Miranda warnings. Viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, the evidence supports the conclusion that the defendant was not deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way during the first interrogation, conducted in a carport next to his residence, and the trial court's finding to that effect in not plainly wrong or without evidence to support it. The argument that the phrasing of right-to-counsel portions of the Miranda warnings on that day tainted his statements…
Open court document ↗Documents and links