Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Ray v. Ready

No. 180060Supreme Court of Virginia

180060 Ray v. Ready 12/20/2018 In a widow's action to claim an elective share of the augmented estate of her deceased husband, the complaint naming his "Estate" was a nullity and could not toll the running of …

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

180060 Ray v. Ready 12/20/2018 In a widow's action to claim an elective share of the augmented estate of her deceased husband, th…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Dec 20, 2018
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

180060 Ray v. Ready 12/20/2018 In a widow's action to claim an elective share of the augmented estate of her deceased husband, the complaint naming his "Estate" was a nullity and could not toll the running of the statute of limitations on that claim. Even though the complaint against the "Estate" was served on the personal representative, it was a nullity, not curable by amendment to insert the personal representative as a defendant, and it was not saved by the provisions of Code § 8.01-6.3 because the complaint, read as a whole, did not otherwise identify the personal representative. Thus, the circuit court did not err in denying the plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint to name the pe…

Open court document ↗