The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
No. 171494Supreme Court of Virginia
171494 Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated 10/11/2018 In response to a certified question of Virginia law from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia requesting that t…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
171494 Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated 10/11/2018 In response to a certified question of Virginia law from the Uni…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Oct 11, 2018
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
171494 Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated 10/11/2018 In response to a certified question of Virginia law from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia requesting that this Court exercise jurisdiction pursuant to Article VI, Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia and Rule 5:40, the question as restated being: Does an employer owe a duty of care to a family member who alleges exposure to asbestos from the work clothes of an employee, where the family member alleges the employer's negligence allowed asbestos fibers to be regularly transported away from the place of employment to the employee's home? The restated question is answered in the affirmativ…
Open court document ↗Documents and links