The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Shin v. Commonwealth
170128 Shin v. Commonwealth 12/28/2017 In an appeal from conviction for unreasonable refusal to submit a breath test in violation of Code § 18.2-268.3, the judgment is affirmed. The contention that Virginia's …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
170128 Shin v. Commonwealth 12/28/2017 In an appeal from conviction for unreasonable refusal to submit a breath test in violation…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Dec 28, 2017
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
170128 Shin v. Commonwealth 12/28/2017 In an appeal from conviction for unreasonable refusal to submit a breath test in violation of Code § 18.2-268.3, the judgment is affirmed. The contention that Virginia's implied consent law imposes an unconstitutional condition upon the privilege to drive within the Commonwealth, making it reasonable for a driver to refuse to provide a blood or breath sample when arrested on suspicion for driving while intoxicated is rejected. Nor is there merit in the argument that Code § 18.2-268.3 lacks an objective definition of what constitutes a reasonable refusal under the statute. The implied consent law also does not violate the Virginia Constitution.
Open court document ↗