The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n v. Bumgardner (Corrected)
No. 170133Supreme Court of Virginia
170133 Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n v. Bumgardner (Corrected) 07/20/2017 In review of a complaint by the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission filed against a senior judge of the Court of Appeals and a re…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
170133 Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n v. Bumgardner (Corrected) 07/20/2017 In review of a complaint by the Judicial Inquiry and…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jul 20, 2017
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
170133 Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n v. Bumgardner (Corrected) 07/20/2017 In review of a complaint by the Judicial Inquiry and Review Commission filed against a senior judge of the Court of Appeals and a retired circuit court judge, in which it was asserted that these judges violated the Canons 1, 2A, 2B, 4D(1), and 5A(1) of the Virginia Canons of Judicial Conduct in relation to a group of persons opposing a referendum to move a county courthouse, there is not clear and convincing evidence that either judge engaged in either "misconduct" or "conduct prejudicial to the proper administration of justice," as provided in Article VI § 10 of the Constitution of Virginia. The complaint is dismi…
Open court document ↗Documents and links