The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Vasquez v. Commonwealth
No. 141071Supreme Court of Virginia
141071 Vasquez v. Commonwealth 02/12/2016 The convictions and sentences of two defendants -- who were 16 years of age when they perpetrated rape at knifepoint and some 30 other offenses -- are affirmed. There …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
141071 Vasquez v. Commonwealth 02/12/2016 The convictions and sentences of two defendants -- who were 16 years of age when they p…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 12, 2016
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
141071 Vasquez v. Commonwealth 02/12/2016 The convictions and sentences of two defendants -- who were 16 years of age when they perpetrated rape at knifepoint and some 30 other offenses -- are affirmed. There is no basis for declaring the multiple term-of-years sentences imposed to be cruel and unusual under the Eighth Amendment. Nothing in governing constitutional case law dictates that multiple sentences involving multiple crimes be treated, for Eighth Amendment purposes, in exactly the same manner as a single life-without-parole sentence for a single crime. Doing so would require extension of the categorical rule of case law far beyond any binding precedent, embracing a wholly new doctri…
Open court document ↗Documents and links