The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Chacey v. Garvey
150005 Chacey v. Garvey 12/30/2015 In a case for timber trespass under the provisions of Code § 55-332, the trial court erred in ruling that the statutory phrase allowing recovery of "directly associated legal…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
150005 Chacey v. Garvey 12/30/2015 In a case for timber trespass under the provisions of Code § 55-332, the trial court erred in …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Dec 30, 2015
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
150005 Chacey v. Garvey 12/30/2015 In a case for timber trespass under the provisions of Code § 55-332, the trial court erred in ruling that the statutory phrase allowing recovery of "directly associated legal costs" includes attorney's fees. Virginia follows the "American Rule," under which, absent a specific contractual or statutory provision to the contrary, attorney's fees are not recoverable by a prevailing litigant from the losing litigant. The authority for awarding costs and attorney's fees is in derogation of common law and, therefore, subject to strict interpretation. In this statute, the General Assembly did not include the right to recover attorney's fees. On the issue of damage…
Open court document ↗