The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
CPM Virginia v. MJM Golf
No. 150278Supreme Court of Virginia
150278 CPM Virginia v. MJM Golf 12/17/2015 (Revised 03/13/2017) The circuit court erred as a matter of law in its interpretation of warranty provisions in a golf course development agreement and contract for s…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
150278 CPM Virginia v. MJM Golf 12/17/2015 (Revised 03/13/2017) The circuit court erred as a matter of law in its interpretation …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Dec 17, 2015
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
150278 CPM Virginia v. MJM Golf 12/17/2015 (Revised 03/13/2017) The circuit court erred as a matter of law in its interpretation of warranty provisions in a golf course development agreement and contract for sale of real estate. None of the terms required the plaintiff to ensure that fly ash previously deposited on the property be covered with at least 18 inches of topsoil as contended in the defendant's counterclaim. Nor did a conditional use permit and state regulations mandate that plaintiff place the required amount of top soil on the property prior to closing, since there never was such a warranty in this case and, even if there had been, it could not have been violated prior to closin…
Open court document ↗Documents and links