Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Grafmuller v. Commonwealth

No. 150433Supreme Court of Virginia

150433 Grafmuller v. Commonwealth 11/05/2015 When a felony sentence exceeds the maximum provided by law, the defendant has a constitutional and statutory right to be present at a hearing for resentencing, whic…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

150433 Grafmuller v. Commonwealth 11/05/2015 When a felony sentence exceeds the maximum provided by law, the defendant has a cons…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Nov 5, 2015
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

150433 Grafmuller v. Commonwealth 11/05/2015 When a felony sentence exceeds the maximum provided by law, the defendant has a constitutional and statutory right to be present at a hearing for resentencing, which is a critical stage of the proceedings that can affect his interest. This bright-line rule is not limited to cases in which the prior sentence was imposed by a jury, and applies equally to sentences imposed by a judge. In this case, involving a defendant who had entered Alford pleas of guilty to various sexual offenses involving minors, the judgment of the circuit court entered upon a resentencing -- without first holding a new sentencing hearing at which the defendant was present --…

Open court document ↗