The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Anheuser-Busch Co. v. Cantrell (ORDER)
No. 140748Supreme Court of Virginia
140748 Anheuser-Busch Co. v. Cantrell (ORDER) 04/16/2015 In mesothelioma litigation brought against numerous defendants who owned premises where plaintiff had previously worked and allegedly suffered exposure …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
140748 Anheuser-Busch Co. v. Cantrell (ORDER) 04/16/2015 In mesothelioma litigation brought against numerous defendants who owned…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 16, 2015
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
140748 Anheuser-Busch Co. v. Cantrell (ORDER) 04/16/2015 In mesothelioma litigation brought against numerous defendants who owned premises where plaintiff had previously worked and allegedly suffered exposure to asbestos, the circuit court erred in granting plaintiff's motion for nonsuit after the parties had completed their briefing and argument on demurrers. An action is submitted for decision within the meaning of Code § 8.01-380(A) when the case is in the hands of the trial judge for final disposition, either on a dispositive motion or upon the merits, and a demurrer is a dispositive motion for the purpose of precluding a nonsuit under this statute. In this case, neither the parties nor…
Open court document ↗Documents and links