The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Owens v. DRS Automotive FantomWorks, Inc.
No. 140171Supreme Court of Virginia
140171 Owens v. DRS Automotive FantomWorks, Inc. 10/31/2014 In a contract fraud and Virginia Consumer Protection Act suit, arising out of the repair and renovation of an antique automobile, the circuit court d…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
140171 Owens v. DRS Automotive FantomWorks, Inc. 10/31/2014 In a contract fraud and Virginia Consumer Protection Act suit, arisin…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Oct 31, 2014
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
140171 Owens v. DRS Automotive FantomWorks, Inc. 10/31/2014 In a contract fraud and Virginia Consumer Protection Act suit, arising out of the repair and renovation of an antique automobile, the circuit court did not err in granting a motion to strike at the conclusion of plaintiffs' case. Plaintiffs were bound by uncontradicted testimony they elicited in their case in chief, and the trial court's comment that the testimony of two witnesses was credible did not usurp the function of the jury. Protection afforded under the Virginia Consumer Protection Act extends beyond fraud, and it does not require the consumer to prove in every case that misrepresentations were made knowingly or with the i…
Open court document ↗Documents and links