The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Lucas v. Woody
No. 131064Supreme Court of Virginia
131064 Lucas v. Woody 04/17/2014 In a suit for personal injuries allegedly incurred during confinement in a city jail, the one-year statute of limitations in Code § 8.01-243.2 governing causes of action relate…
The clerk's words are kept exactly as filed. We do not say who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
131064 Lucas v. Woody 04/17/2014 In a suit for personal injuries allegedly incurred during confinement in a city jail, the one-ye…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First added here
- October 4, 2026
- Last entry
- April 17, 2014
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
131064 Lucas v. Woody 04/17/2014 In a suit for personal injuries allegedly incurred during confinement in a city jail, the one-year statute of limitations in Code § 8.01-243.2 governing causes of action related to conditions of confinement in a state or local correctional facility is applicable -- regardless of whether the plaintiff is still incarcerated when such action is filed. Thus, the circuit court did not err in finding that this plaintiff's state law claims, set forth in a complaint filed 16 months after her release from jail, were barred by that statute of limitations. Nor did the court abuse its discretion in refusing to grant leave for plaintiff to file a second amended complaint…
Open court document ↗Documents and links