The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Shebelskie v. Brown
No. 130503Supreme Court of Virginia
130503 Shebelskie v. Brown 01/10/2014 In sanctioning two Virginia attorneys pursuant to Code § 8.01-271.1, the circuit court judge abused her discretion because one of the attorneys neither signed the relevant…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
130503 Shebelskie v. Brown 01/10/2014 In sanctioning two Virginia attorneys pursuant to Code § 8.01-271.1, the circuit court judg…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 10, 2014
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
130503 Shebelskie v. Brown 01/10/2014 In sanctioning two Virginia attorneys pursuant to Code § 8.01-271.1, the circuit court judge abused her discretion because one of the attorneys neither signed the relevant brief nor made a motion under the terms of that statute and, thus, did not violate Code § 8.01-271.1. The other attorney also did not violate the statute because he could have formed, after reasonable inquiry, the belief that the relevant brief and the arguments set forth therein were warranted under existing law. The judgment imposing sanctions is reversed and the rule to show cause underlying that judgment is dismissed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links