The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.
121046 Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. 04/18/2013 In a Virginia suit between individuals and entities in the coal industry, alleging tortious interference with existing and prospective contractual and busines…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
121046 Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. 04/18/2013 In a Virginia suit between individuals and entities in the coal industry, alle…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 18, 2013
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
121046 Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. 04/18/2013 In a Virginia suit between individuals and entities in the coal industry, alleging tortious interference with existing and prospective contractual and business relations, fraudulent misrepresentation, deceit, and concealment, and seeking compensatory and punitive damages, the circuit court erred in finding that res judicata operates to bar plaintiffs' current action based on a 15-year history of multiple state and federal litigations between the parties. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Open court document ↗