The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Commonwealth v. Tuma
No. 121177Supreme Court of Virginia
121177 Commonwealth v. Tuma 04/18/2013 In a prosecution for taking indecent liberties with a child, aggravated sexual battery, and animate object penetration, the Commonwealth committed no Due Process violatio…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
121177 Commonwealth v. Tuma 04/18/2013 In a prosecution for taking indecent liberties with a child, aggravated sexual battery, an…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 18, 2013
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
121177 Commonwealth v. Tuma 04/18/2013 In a prosecution for taking indecent liberties with a child, aggravated sexual battery, and animate object penetration, the Commonwealth committed no Due Process violation under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) by delaying production of an audio-tape recording of an investigative interview with the victim that could have been used in impeachment of four witnesses, because the recording was made available to the defendant during trial in sufficient time to allow for its effective use. The judgment of the Court of Appeals on the Brady issue is reversed and the case is remanded for consideration of a second assignment of error, not previously address…
Open court document ↗Documents and links