The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Northam v. Virginia State Bar
No. 121623Supreme Court of Virginia
121623 Northam v. Virginia State Bar 02/28/2013 In Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board proceedings finding that an attorney violated Rule 1.10(a) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct, the use of "kn…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
121623 Northam v. Virginia State Bar 02/28/2013 In Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board proceedings finding that an attorney vio…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 28, 2013
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
121623 Northam v. Virginia State Bar 02/28/2013 In Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board proceedings finding that an attorney violated Rule 1.10(a) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct, the use of "knowingly" in the Rule is not without purpose, and is a separate and distinct element that must be proven before a violation can be established. An attorney in a law firm must have had knowledge at the time he represented a party that his partner was prohibited from doing so. Nothing in the board's findings of fact in this case resolves the issue whether the subject attorney continued representing the husband in a divorce case at a time when he knew that his partner was disqualified from…
Open court document ↗Documents and links