Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Piney Meeting House Investments v. Hart

No. 111548Supreme Court of Virginia

111548 Piney Meeting House Investments v. Hart 06/07/2012 In an injunction action relating to alleged interference with use of an easement, the circuit court erred in sustaining certain exceptions to the repor…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

111548 Piney Meeting House Investments v. Hart 06/07/2012 In an injunction action relating to alleged interference with use of an…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Jun 7, 2012
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

111548 Piney Meeting House Investments v. Hart 06/07/2012 In an injunction action relating to alleged interference with use of an easement, the circuit court erred in sustaining certain exceptions to the report of a commissioner in chancery regarding a buried propane tank and a well. The court erred in concluding that a buried propane tank and well under an easement for ingress and egress constituted unreasonable interference with the easement owner's rights as a matter of law, even if the improvements did not affect vehicular access. The circuit court's award of costs to the prevailing party is affirmed, but its award of attorney's fees is reversed. The judgment is affirmed in part and rev…

Open court document ↗