The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Arnold v. Wallace
No. 110394Supreme Court of Virginia
110394 Arnold v. Wallace 04/20/2012 In a personal injury suit arising from an automobile collision, a sufficient foundation was laid for admission of the plaintiff's "medical chart" through testimony of a doct…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
110394 Arnold v. Wallace 04/20/2012 In a personal injury suit arising from an automobile collision, a sufficient foundation was l…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 20, 2012
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
110394 Arnold v. Wallace 04/20/2012 In a personal injury suit arising from an automobile collision, a sufficient foundation was laid for admission of the plaintiff's "medical chart" through testimony of a doctor in the practice group which treated her, explaining the regular preparation of the record and reliance upon it in treating plaintiff. It is not the offering party's obligation to negate the presence of opinions within a proffered business record; rather, it is incumbent upon the objecting party to identify any inadmissible opinion in the record, and plaintiff's objection to the "foundation" for this exhibit was insufficient to apprise the circuit court of additional specific objecti…
Open court document ↗Documents and links