The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Wyatt v. McDermott
111497 Wyatt v. McDermott 04/20/2012 (Revised 04/24/2012) In response to questions of law certified to the Court by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, pursuant to Article VI…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
111497 Wyatt v. McDermott 04/20/2012 (Revised 04/24/2012) In response to questions of law certified to the Court by the United St…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 20, 2012
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
111497 Wyatt v. McDermott 04/20/2012 (Revised 04/24/2012) In response to questions of law certified to the Court by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, pursuant to Article VI, Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia and Rule 5:40, regarding whether Virginia recognizes tortious interference with parental rights as a cause of action, that question is answered in the affirmative, and the elements of that tort are set forth in this opinion. The common law derivation and present application of the tort, along with important affirmative defenses, are discussed.
Open court document ↗