The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Bowman v. Concepcion
No. 102144Supreme Court of Virginia
102144 Bowman v. Concepcion 03/02/2012 In a medical malpractice action, the requirement for a plaintiff to obtain service of process on a defendant within 12 months of filing an action, Code § 8.01-275.1 and R…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
102144 Bowman v. Concepcion 03/02/2012 In a medical malpractice action, the requirement for a plaintiff to obtain service of proc…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Mar 2, 2012
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
102144 Bowman v. Concepcion 03/02/2012 In a medical malpractice action, the requirement for a plaintiff to obtain service of process on a defendant within 12 months of filing an action, Code § 8.01-275.1 and Rule 3:5(e), was not subject to extension by the circuit court for "good cause," and the court correctly determined that the plaintiff's failure to obtain service on the defendant within 12 months from the filing of the complaint resulted from a lack of due diligence on her part. The judgment dismissing the action with prejudice is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links