The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Wakole v. Barber
No. 102176Supreme Court of Virginia
102176 Wakole v. Barber 03/02/2012 In a personal injury case, the circuit court did not err in allowing counsel for plaintiff to argue in closing that each item of damage was separate and had a fixed numerical…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
102176 Wakole v. Barber 03/02/2012 In a personal injury case, the circuit court did not err in allowing counsel for plaintiff to …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Mar 2, 2012
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
102176 Wakole v. Barber 03/02/2012 In a personal injury case, the circuit court did not err in allowing counsel for plaintiff to argue in closing that each item of damage was separate and had a fixed numerical value based on a formula provided by the circuit court, or in permitting her counsel to enumerate each item of damages to the jury during closing argument. As presented, the argument made for specific amounts for various types of damages did not invade the province of the jury, nor did it violate Code § 8.01-379.1. The judgment of the trial court upon a jury verdict for plaintiff is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links