The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Campbell County v. Royal
101168 Campbell County v. Royal 01/13/2012 (Revised 01/30/2012) In an action by landowners for damages resulting from contamination of groundwater, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the pl…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
101168 Campbell County v. Royal 01/13/2012 (Revised 01/30/2012) In an action by landowners for damages resulting from contaminati…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 13, 2012
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
101168 Campbell County v. Royal 01/13/2012 (Revised 01/30/2012) In an action by landowners for damages resulting from contamination of groundwater, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs under the "Discharge of Oil Into Waters" Law, Code § 62.1-44.34:14 through § 62.1-44.34:23, because those statutes do not apply to the passive, gradual seepage of leachate and landfill gas into groundwater. Since no damage instruction was tendered setting forth the proper measure of recovery on the plaintiff's alternative claim for inverse condemnation, there is no basis on which the plaintiffs can pursue that claim or retain the jury's award of damages. The judgment is revers…
Open court document ↗