The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Northern Virginia Real Estate v. Martins
No. 101836Supreme Court of Virginia
101836 Northern Virginia Real Estate v. Martins 01/13/2012 In sanction proceedings following nonsuit -- after a three-day presentation of plaintiff's evidence on claims for contract expectancy, conspiracy and …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
101836 Northern Virginia Real Estate v. Martins 01/13/2012 In sanction proceedings following nonsuit -- after a three-day present…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 13, 2012
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
101836 Northern Virginia Real Estate v. Martins 01/13/2012 In sanction proceedings following nonsuit -- after a three-day presentation of plaintiff's evidence on claims for contract expectancy, conspiracy and defamation arising from a real estate transaction -- the trial court had authority under Rule 1:1 to suspend the nonsuit order and, by explicitly doing so, it properly retained jurisdiction to consider and impose sanctions. The circuit court did not abuse its discretion when it imposed sanctions jointly and severally against the plaintiff real estate company and broker, as well as their attorney, pursuant to Code § 8.01-271.1. The circuit court also did not abuse its discretion in dete…
Open court document ↗Documents and links