The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hospitals
No. 101102Supreme Court of Virginia
101102 Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hospitals 11/04/2011 In a medical malpractice action, the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the plaintiff's expert witnesses because her cou…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
101102 Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hospitals 11/04/2011 In a medical malpractice action, the circuit court did not ab…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 4, 2011
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
101102 Landrum v. Chippenham & Johnston-Willis Hospitals 11/04/2011 In a medical malpractice action, the circuit court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the plaintiff's expert witnesses because her counsel, an out-of-state attorney who was admitted pro hac vice, failed to obey pretrial scheduling orders and discovery obligations concerning identification of such witnesses and timely disclosure of the substance of their expected testimony, including the filing of papers not properly signed by local counsel. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links