The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Mulford v. Walnut Hill Farm Group
No. 100333Supreme Court of Virginia
100333 Mulford v. Walnut Hill Farm Group 06/09/2011 (Revised 06/10/2011) In an action by a landowner claiming a legal right to access certain property, the plaintiff failed to prove the requisite formal accept…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
100333 Mulford v. Walnut Hill Farm Group 06/09/2011 (Revised 06/10/2011) In an action by a landowner claiming a legal right to ac…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 9, 2011
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
100333 Mulford v. Walnut Hill Farm Group 06/09/2011 (Revised 06/10/2011) In an action by a landowner claiming a legal right to access certain property, the plaintiff failed to prove the requisite formal acceptance or express assertion of dominion over a purported access road by public authority. The trial court's finding of fact regarding lack of use by plaintiff's predecessors was not plainly wrong, nor did the circuit court misapply the law in denying a prescriptive easement. There was no error in finding that the plaintiff failed to show that defendant acted with unclean hands, or that it should be estopped from denying an easement. There was no basis on which to presuppose the existence…
Open court document ↗Documents and links