The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Riverside Healthcare Ass'n v. Forbes
No. 100108Supreme Court of Virginia
100108 Riverside Healthcare Ass'n v. Forbes 04/21/2011 In a trustee's action concerning allocation of compensation from an eminent domain proceeding between income and principal, because the grantor expressly …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
100108 Riverside Healthcare Ass'n v. Forbes 04/21/2011 In a trustee's action concerning allocation of compensation from an eminen…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 21, 2011
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
100108 Riverside Healthcare Ass'n v. Forbes 04/21/2011 In a trustee's action concerning allocation of compensation from an eminent domain proceeding between income and principal, because the grantor expressly directed the allocation of such compensation to income under the language appearing in the trust agreement, the portion of the circuit court's judgment granting partial summary judgment in favor of the trustee is affirmed. However the circuit court erred in sustaining the trustee's demurrer to the remainder beneficiary's counterclaim for an equitable accounting pursuant to Code § 8.01-31, and that portion of the judgment is reversed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links