The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Jones v. Williams
091745 Jones v. Williams 11/04/2010 (Revised 05/23/2011) In a medical malpractice action against the estate of a deceased doctor, a nurse who gave testimony for the plaintiff as a non-party witness at trial wa…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
091745 Jones v. Williams 11/04/2010 (Revised 05/23/2011) In a medical malpractice action against the estate of a deceased doctor,…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Nov 4, 2010
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
091745 Jones v. Williams 11/04/2010 (Revised 05/23/2011) In a medical malpractice action against the estate of a deceased doctor, a nurse who gave testimony for the plaintiff as a non-party witness at trial was not an "interested party" whose testimony required corroboration under Code § 8.01-397. Thus there is no error in the circuit court's denial of the defendant's motions to strike or its refusal to instruct the jury on the Dead Man's Act. Judgment for the plaintiff is affirmed.
Open court document ↗