The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Aguilera v. Christian
No. 091493Supreme Court of Virginia
091493 Aguilera v. Christian 09/16/2010 (Revised 05/23/2011) In a personal injury litigation, the complaint was invalid and a nullity because it was not signed by the plaintiff as the party with the cause of a…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
091493 Aguilera v. Christian 09/16/2010 (Revised 05/23/2011) In a personal injury litigation, the complaint was invalid and a nul…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 16, 2010
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
091493 Aguilera v. Christian 09/16/2010 (Revised 05/23/2011) In a personal injury litigation, the complaint was invalid and a nullity because it was not signed by the plaintiff as the party with the cause of action, or by an attorney licensed to practice law in this Commonwealth. A party who is acting pro se may not authorize a person who is not licensed to practice law in this Commonwealth to sign a complaint on behalf of the pro se party. Therefore, the trial court did not err in dismissing the complaint, and the judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links