The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Cotton Creek Circles v. San Luis Valley Water Co.
No. 090283Supreme Court of Virginia
090283 Cotton Creek Circles v. San Luis Valley Water Co. 02/25/2010 The circuit court did not err in confirming an arbitration award where a broad arbitration provision in a limited liability company operating…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
090283 Cotton Creek Circles v. San Luis Valley Water Co. 02/25/2010 The circuit court did not err in confirming an arbitration aw…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 25, 2010
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
090283 Cotton Creek Circles v. San Luis Valley Water Co. 02/25/2010 The circuit court did not err in confirming an arbitration award where a broad arbitration provision in a limited liability company operating agreement conferred on the arbitration panel the power to resolve "any dispute" with respect to that agreement, necessarily including authority to settle a dispute over the proper interpretation and application of a non-compete clause in the agreement. Even if the panel erred in its interpretation of the agreement, that error does not provide a basis for vacating the award under to section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act. The judgment is affirmed.
Open court document ↗Documents and links