The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Virginia Tech. and State University v. Quesenberry
No. 080976Supreme Court of Virginia
080976 Virginia Tech. and State University v. Quesenberry 04/17/2009 In review of a state employee's termination grievance determination in accordance with Code § 2.2-3006(B), the Court of Appeals erred in aff…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
080976 Virginia Tech. and State University v. Quesenberry 04/17/2009 In review of a state employee's termination grievance determ…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Apr 17, 2009
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
080976 Virginia Tech. and State University v. Quesenberry 04/17/2009 In review of a state employee's termination grievance determination in accordance with Code § 2.2-3006(B), the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the circuit court's judgment that a hearing officer's decision upholding the termination was "contradictory to law," because the grievant failed to identify to the circuit court any applicable law that the decision contradicted. Thus both the Court of Appeals and the circuit court lacked any basis for reviewing the hearing officer's decision. The Court of Appeals also erred in affirming the circuit court's judgment reinstating the grievant to his previous position of employment…
Open court document ↗Documents and links