The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Seguin v. Northrup Grumman Systems Corp.
No. 080217Supreme Court of Virginia
080217 Seguin v. Northrup Grumman Systems Corp. 02/27/2009 In a defamation action against the plaintiff's employer relating to a work performance evaluation, the circuit court's order compelling arbitration pu…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
080217 Seguin v. Northrup Grumman Systems Corp. 02/27/2009 In a defamation action against the plaintiff's employer relating to a …
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 27, 2009
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
080217 Seguin v. Northrup Grumman Systems Corp. 02/27/2009 In a defamation action against the plaintiff's employer relating to a work performance evaluation, the circuit court's order compelling arbitration pursuant to the provisions of the Virginia Uniform Arbitration Act was not appealable under Code § 8.01-581.016. Additionally, the order was not a final judgment order contemplated by Code § 8.01-670(A)(3) since the circuit court retains jurisdiction under Code § 8.01-581.010 to vacate an arbitration award and under Code § 8.01-581.011 to modify or correct an arbitration award. Thus the order was not appealable and there is no jurisdiction to review the merits of plaintiff's contentions…
Open court document ↗Documents and links