Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Remora Investments v. Orr

No. 080313Supreme Court of Virginia

080313 Remora Investments v. Orr 02/27/2009 In considering a suit brought by a member of a limited liability company as a direct action against the manager for alleged breach of a fiduciary duty, nothing in th…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

080313 Remora Investments v. Orr 02/27/2009 In considering a suit brought by a member of a limited liability company as a direct …

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Feb 27, 2009
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

080313 Remora Investments v. Orr 02/27/2009 In considering a suit brought by a member of a limited liability company as a direct action against the manager for alleged breach of a fiduciary duty, nothing in the statutes relating to limited liability companies provides for fiduciary duties between members or between a member and a manager. Analogous case law relating to corporations does not impose such duties, and the operating agreement of the present limited liability company does not create such duties. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in dismissing the member's complaint because it did not have standing to bring a direct action instead of a derivative proceeding on behalf of the…

Open court document ↗