The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Murphy v. Commonwealth
080852 Murphy v. Commonwealth 02/27/2009 Code § 18.2-262, which authorizes compelled testimony from certain witnesses and in return makes specific provision for immunity applicable to those witnesses, is fully…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
080852 Murphy v. Commonwealth 02/27/2009 Code § 18.2-262, which authorizes compelled testimony from certain witnesses and in retu…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 27, 2009
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
080852 Murphy v. Commonwealth 02/27/2009 Code § 18.2-262, which authorizes compelled testimony from certain witnesses and in return makes specific provision for immunity applicable to those witnesses, is fully coextensive with constitutional protections for a witness whose compelled testimony tends to incriminate him. The immunity protections of Code § 18.2-262 apply only to witnesses whose testimony has been compelled, and hence the judgment of the Court of Appeals upholding the conviction of a defendant in a prosecution for possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute, after he testified about the same transaction in a case against another defendant, is affirmed.
Open court document ↗