The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Parfitt v. Parfitt
No. 081100Supreme Court of Virginia
081100 Parfitt v. Parfitt 02/27/2009 The trial court erred in dismissing a complaint filed by the administrator of an estate against the decedent's son, based on an erroneous finding that a confidential relati…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
081100 Parfitt v. Parfitt 02/27/2009 The trial court erred in dismissing a complaint filed by the administrator of an estate agai…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 27, 2009
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
081100 Parfitt v. Parfitt 02/27/2009 The trial court erred in dismissing a complaint filed by the administrator of an estate against the decedent's son, based on an erroneous finding that a confidential relationship did not exist with respect to transactions involving a joint bank account. The trial court also erred in applying evidentiary burdens regarding proof of undue influence and corroboration necessary under the dead man's statute. The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial consistent with this opinion.
Open court document ↗Documents and links