The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Jackson v. Qureshi
080502 Jackson v. Qureshi 01/16/2009 In a medical wrongful death action, because the evidence clearly demonstrated that a proffered medical expert witness met the statutory "knowledge" and "active clinical pra…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
080502 Jackson v. Qureshi 01/16/2009 In a medical wrongful death action, because the evidence clearly demonstrated that a proffer…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jan 16, 2009
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
080502 Jackson v. Qureshi 01/16/2009 In a medical wrongful death action, because the evidence clearly demonstrated that a proffered medical expert witness met the statutory "knowledge" and "active clinical practice" requirements under Code § 8.01-581.20 to testify with regard to the medical procedure at issue, the circuit court's judgment dismissing the case with prejudice after finding that the expert could not testify is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Open court document ↗