The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Logan v. Commonwealth
No. 072342Supreme Court of Virginia
072342 Logan v. Commonwealth 09/12/2008 The Court of Appeals erred in holding that the exclusionary rule never applies to evidence submitted in probation revocation proceedings, regardless of the searching off…
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
072342 Logan v. Commonwealth 09/12/2008 The Court of Appeals erred in holding that the exclusionary rule never applies to evidenc…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Sep 12, 2008
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
072342 Logan v. Commonwealth 09/12/2008 The Court of Appeals erred in holding that the exclusionary rule never applies to evidence submitted in probation revocation proceedings, regardless of the searching officer's conduct or bad faith. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded for a review of the defendant's challenge to the trial court's determination that the police officer's actions did not constitute bad faith.
Open court document ↗Documents and links