The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
Webb v. Smith
071008 Webb v. Smith 06/06/2008 On the particular facts and circumstances of this medical malpractice action, where the defendant doctor failed to perform one of two scheduled procedures, leading plaintiff to …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
071008 Webb v. Smith 06/06/2008 On the particular facts and circumstances of this medical malpractice action, where the defendant…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Jun 6, 2008
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
071008 Webb v. Smith 06/06/2008 On the particular facts and circumstances of this medical malpractice action, where the defendant doctor failed to perform one of two scheduled procedures, leading plaintiff to undergo a second surgical procedure, the plaintiff was not required to present expert testimony on the issue of causation. The trial court therefore erred in setting aside a jury verdict in her favor based on the absence of such proof. The judgment is reversed and final judgment is entered for plaintiff.
Open court document ↗