Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Prince Seating Corp. v. Rabideau (ORDER)

No. 070277Supreme Court of Virginia

070277 Prince Seating Corp. v. Rabideau (ORDER) 04/18/2008 An appellant must present a sufficient record for an appellate court to determine whether a lower court has erred, including the basis of the challeng…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

070277 Prince Seating Corp. v. Rabideau (ORDER) 04/18/2008 An appellant must present a sufficient record for an appellate court t…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Apr 18, 2008
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

070277 Prince Seating Corp. v. Rabideau (ORDER) 04/18/2008 An appellant must present a sufficient record for an appellate court to determine whether a lower court has erred, including the basis of the challenged ruling. Where an appellant claimed that its motion under Code § 8.01-428(A) to set aside a default judgment was erroneously denied, but failed to include any transcript of the circuit court's hearing on that motion or a statement of facts relating to that hearing as required by Rule 5:11, the appellate court could not consider several arguments advanced by appellant on its claim of error, as there was no evidence establishing that the arguments were ever pled or otherwise made to th…

Open court document ↗