Skip to page content
V★TE FILESUnited States edition
Independent · nonpartisan
Illustrative anonymous person approaching a public clerk intake window
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC

Snell v. Commonwealth (ORDER)

No. 070528Supreme Court of Virginia

070528 Snell v. Commonwealth (ORDER) 04/18/2008 In a case involving the issue of whether a police officer had probable cause to seize folded currency found in a defendant's wallet and subject it to further sea…

Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.
01
The caption

The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.

02
The movement

Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.

03
The proof

The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.

Current update

070528 Snell v. Commonwealth (ORDER) 04/18/2008 In a case involving the issue of whether a police officer had probable cause to s…

At a glance
Court
Supreme Court of Virginia
First seen
Oct 4, 2026
Last entry
Apr 18, 2008
Policy at issue

No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.

Official docket

Case timeline

The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.

Docket entry

070528 Snell v. Commonwealth (ORDER) 04/18/2008 In a case involving the issue of whether a police officer had probable cause to seize folded currency found in a defendant's wallet and subject it to further search by unfolding it to reveal drugs, the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the circuit court's denial of the defendant's motion to suppress. The folded currency at issue in Grandison v. Commonwealth, 274 Va. 316, 645 S.E.2d 298 (2007) is not materially distinguishable from the folded currency at issue in this case. As a result, the Court of Appeals' ruling conflicts with the contrary ruling in Grandison, and its judgment constitutes reversible error. The judgment is reversed, the con…

Open court document ↗