The caption
The parties exactly as the court lists them—not a claim about the merits.
State court of last resort · ST-VA-SC
Magruder v. Commonwealth
No. 070762Supreme Court of Virginia
070762 Magruder v. Commonwealth 02/29/2008 In collected appeals in which multiple defendants each claimed that admission into evidence, pursuant to Code § 19.2-187, of a certificate of analysis in the absence …
Clerk language is kept verbatim. Vote Files does not infer who is winning.The movement
Orders, motions, and filings in the clerk's own words and sequence.
The proof
The official docket and available court documents attached to every update.
070762 Magruder v. Commonwealth 02/29/2008 In collected appeals in which multiple defendants each claimed that admission into evi…
- Court
- Supreme Court of Virginia
- First seen
- Oct 4, 2026
- Last entry
- Feb 29, 2008
No bill or executive-order citation is attached to this file.
Official docket
Case timeline
The clerk's wording is shown verbatim and linked to the court's own document page where available.
Docket entry
070762 Magruder v. Commonwealth 02/29/2008 In collected appeals in which multiple defendants each claimed that admission into evidence, pursuant to Code § 19.2-187, of a certificate of analysis in the absence of testimony at trial from the person who performed the particular analysis and prepared the certificate violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, it is concluded that the procedure provided in Code § 19.2-187.1 adequately protects a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause. Because the defendants in these appeals failed to utilize that procedure, they waived the challenges under the Confrontation Clause to the admissibility of the cer…
Open court document ↗Documents and links